What is the difference between refworks and endnote

As it is cloud-based you will not need to download any software to use it, however you may still be required to download and install the plugin for Word. EndNote is more complex and suitable for Higher Degree Research students and staff, as it has additional features. You will need to download EndNote onto your personal PC, which limits its use. You can also download the Word plugin if needed. The Library provides researchers and research students with support in their use of EndNote.

Please go to the Library's Referencing Tools page for more information on both systems. You can also go to our Video Tutorials page or the RefWorks tutorial page by Proquest to learn how to use this software.

Was this helpful? Yes 3 No 0. Please note: RefWorks is recommended for undergraduates and postgraduates taking coursework degrees. It is more straightforward to use than Endnote, particularly for beginners. EndNote is more complex and suitable for Higher Degree Research students and staff, as it has additional features.

Was this helpful? Yes 2 No 0. University Library AskUs. Warning: Your browser has javascript disabled. Toggle menu visibility. Ask Another Question.

Table 1 summarizes key differences between the products. For Mendeley, this review covers the free version only. All four products offer plug-ins for Microsoft Word.

Table 1 shows platforms and browser compatibility. All four products offer a web-based version that works with recent versions of popular browsers. Some tools offer plug-ins for other browsers as well, and all offer browser add-ons bookmarklets, extensions, etc. The Mendeley browser add-on functions only with the online version of Mendeley; the Zotero add-on requires the desktop version for full functionality; and the EndNote add-on can be used in the desktop and online versions. Of the four products, only EndNote and Mendeley offer mobile apps.

While RefWorks and Zotero do not have mobile apps, they do have mobile-friendly sites. All four tools allow users to import files of references from databases or other citation management tools. Users can search within databases, mark references to save or export, and select from a variety of options to add references to their preferred citation manager tools. Users can also use the browser add-ons to automatically import references into their reference collections. The add-ons for Mendeley, RefWorks, and Zotero allow users to import references to their reference collections from multiple databases.

Depending on the database, users can select individual references or batches, and the references and associated PDFs are imported. When displaying a list of PubMed search results, Capture Reference only imported all references on the page; it did not allow us to select specific references to import. Capture Reference did not work at all for us with a list of results from Google Scholar.

The only way to import these results was to open each one and then capture it. It also did not directly capture bibliographic information about web pages as easily as the other add-ons did. When we attempted to import information about a web page using Capture Reference, it created an RIS file that we then had to import into EndNote, whereas the other three add-ons added information about web pages directly.

The tools also offer several other ways to add references. EndNote and RefWorks also allow users to search databases and library catalogs from within the application and import selected search results. EndNote offers an extensive list of free and commercial databases for searching. As of this writing, the new RefWorks only offers PubMed and the Library of Congress as search options, and, when tested, neither search option was functional.

According to the RefWorks lead product manager, institutional account administrators can allow users to search any database that is accessible via the Z He also indicated that ProQuest is building application programming interfaces APIs to integrate RefWorks with other ProQuest tools such as Summon and Primo, which should increase in-app search options [ 5 ].

All four applications allow users to create standalone bibliographies in virtually any word processor, including Google Docs. With EndNote, users can create a standalone bibliography by selecting citations and an output style, and copying and pasting into a word processor document.

Both Mendeley and Zotero allow users to drag references from the desktop client into a word processor, where they will be formatted according to the style that users have selected, the quickest and most user-friendly method of bibliography creation.

RefWorks includes a feature that allows users to generate a bibliography from a batch of references in a folder, but that feature did not work when we tested it, leaving no way to generate standalone bibliographies from citations.

More commonly, users create bibliographies from in-text citations in a manuscript. All four tools offer Microsoft Word plug-ins to support this functionality.

Table 1 provides details about which tools work with other word processors. In EndNote, the bibliography is automatically generated as the citations are inserted into the document. In Mendeley, RefWorks, and Zotero, inserting a citation and creating a bibliography are separate steps, and at least one citation must be added to the document in order to create a bibliography.

All four products made occasional small errors in citations, especially when we cited web pages, but Mendeley performed especially poorly, omitting key information from web page citations, such as date accessed.

Each tool offers different options for adding PDF documents. All four systems allow users to add PDF documents by dragging and dropping them into their reference collections and by attaching them to existing citations. Mendeley monitors the contents of these folders and automatically adds any PDFs to reference collections.